MEASURE
|
EXAMPLE(S) |
CRITERION FOR COMPARISON |
|
· Individually-administered nationally-normed achievement test |
· Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Tests of Achievement (Cluster Scores) · Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Skill Areas · Test of Word Reading Efficiency · Test of Reading Comprehension ·
GRADE Reading Fluency Indicator · Test of Mathematical Abilities |
Scores at or below the 15th percentile or 1 standard deviation below the mean (typically a standard score of 85 or below) · Grade norms ·
Scores reflect performance over time |
|
·
Nationally normed group administered
achievement test |
· Stanford Achievement Test · Metropolitan Achievement Test · Terra Novas · Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills |
Scores at or below the 15th percentile or 1 standard
deviation below the mean (typically a standard score of 85 or below) · Grade norms ·
Scores reflect performance over time |
|
· Standards-based Report Cards · Teacher-determined grading systems · IEP-based individualized grading systems |
Generally, in comparison to the Vermont Framework of Standards and Learning Opportunities · In heterogeneous classrooms, the student’s grade is among the lowest 15% of grade level classmates · Otherwise, the student’s grades represent the lowest 15% in comparison to the expected level of performance for average grade level peers. |
|
· Curriculum-based measures; Teacher made tests Curriculum-based measures continued |
· Teacher made tests · Charts, graphs, checklists indicating student performance over time · Standardized benchmark assessment (AIMSWEB, DIBELS), · Continuous progress monitoring · Running records/fluency measures ·
Math
mad minutes |
Comparison to performance of average grade level peers on same measure · Performance indicates that the student is among the lowest 15% |
|
· Individually-administered Criterion-Referenced Tests
|
·
Qualitative ·
Dynamic
Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) ·
Brigance Inventories ·
Primary Observation Assessment (POA) ·
Developmental ·
Writing
on demand prompt ·
VT Writing/Math portfolio ·
NECAP |
Test results indicate that the student lacks skills or
knowledge typical of an average student at the student’s grade level Comparison to performance of average grade level peers on same measure in relation to VT Framework and Standards of Learning Opportunities ·
Performance indicates that the student is
among the lowest 15% |
|
· Other Individualized measures of adverse effect |
· Student Work · Language Samples · Classroom Portfolios |
Comparison to performance of average grade level peers on same measure Performance indicates that the student is among the lowest 15% |
Vermont Department of
Education Student Support Team revised 10/06