1 - Expected Difference Rating (12-7, 3-2) 2 - Power Rating (13-6, 3-1)
3 - Discrete Rating Model (13-4-2, 0-1-2) 4 - Virtual Game Model (12-6-1, 0-3-1)
5 - Overtake and Feedback (Ranking) (12-7, 4-3) + - Result if disagree with the team who was favored

Inside the (...) above is each system's won/loss record: first "straight up", and then against the spread (when disagreeing with the favorite listed by "the bookies"). The 3rd number listed is for ties: the number of games that the model thinks is dead even. The favorites won 15 and lost 4, and 10 of the 19 favorites covered the spread in 1993.

  W/L Cover Score 1 2 3 4 5 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ 5+
Rose (Bowl): UCLA by 6.5
over Wisconsin
L N 16-21 L L L L W         Y
Orange: Florida State by 16
over Nebraska
W N 18-16 W W W W L Y
Sugar: Florida by 6.5
over West Virginia
W Y 41-7 W W W W L         N
Cotton: Notre Dame by 8
over Texas A&M
W N 24-21 L L W W L Y Y     Y
Sun: Oklahoma by 6.5
over Texas Tech
W Y 41-10 W W T W W     T    
Gator: North Carolina by 3.5
over Alabama
L N 10-24 W W T L L Y Y T N  
Liberty: Louisville by 3.5
over Michigan State
W Y 18-7 W W W T L       T N
Peach: Clemson by 2.5
over Kentucky
W N 14-13 L L W W W Y Y      
Citrus: Tennessee by 10.5
over Penn State
L N 13-31 L L L L W         Y
Fiesta: Miami (Florida) by 6
over Arizona
L N 0-29 L L L L L          
Independence: Virginia Tech by 2.5
over Indiana
W Y 45-20 W L W W L   N     N
Holiday: Ohio State by 14
over BYU
W N 28-21 W W W W W          
Aloha: Colorado by 7
over Fresno State
W Y 41-30 W W W L W       N  
Freedom: USC by 17
over Utah
W N 28-21 W W W W W          
Hall of Fame: Michigan by 15
over North Carolina State
W Y 42-7 W W W W W          
Copper: Kansas State by 3.5
over Wyoming
W Y 52-17 L W W W W N        
Carquest: Boston College by 6.5
over Virginia
W Y 31-13 W W W W W          
Las Vegas: Utah State by 2.5
over Ball State
W Y 42-33 L W L L W N   N N  
Alamo: California by 12
over Iowa
W Y 37-3 W W W W W          

Back to Prof. Trono's Home page. (This page last modified October 31, 2007 .)