Educational Technology Committee

 

EdTech Meeting Tuesday, April 26, 2005

Attending: Mike Battig (chair), John Devlin, Greta Pangborn; and ex officio members: Steven Burks (Libr), Dennis Voigt (CEPC), Susan Breeyear, Bill Anderson.

1.  Minutes of the last meeting (8 March, 2005), previously distributed, were approved as submitted.  Greta was appointed scribe for today’s meeting.

2. We looked over the draft of the year end report. 

  • We should add a comment on the email Mike sent to heads of departments sounding them out on interest in a series of lunches that offer “hints on combining technology and pedagogy” which could be targeted to specific disciplines.
  • We need to add the number of adjuncts that participated in the Teaching with Technology Workshop as well as a quote from the final report.
  • Mike will send the Provost an email noting that information in our final report may be relevant for the five-year review.

3.  Old Business

  • We are still waiting on a reply regarding our McGrath proposal (which was misplaced by the Provost’s office).
  • Mike will send a clarification to Jan indicating that we are looking for money from next year’s budget year (not the current year’s budget).

4.  Other Business                   

  • “IT Budget”
    • Bill outlined the renovation plans for the next two summers.
    • He also noted that a number of projects for this year are on hold, pending the results of the controls audit and the resulting available funds.
  • Bill introduced the proposal for the eCollege Commons which formalizes a system for faculty members to access course material created by their peers. 
    • Faculty Members who submit courses to the Commons will be assured that these materials will only be used for teaching at the College.  The College will not have any intellectual property rights for material placed in the Commons.
    • A question was raised regarding the fact that student work (such as discussion question responses) is the intellectual property of the student and likely cannot be placed in the Commons.  This needs to be clarified in the policy.
    • We will discuss having Ed Tech endorse / promote this proposal in the fall.
  • Laptop Requirement
    • There is some preliminary talk about the possibility of having incoming students purchase specific laptops (determined by the college)
      • The majority of students now come to campus with machines
      • This might serve to reduce the rate of increase in the machine inventory maintained by the college (particularly if laptop use in the classrooms increases)
      • This could make IT support more efficient
      • One serious drawback would be an effective increase in the sticker price of the college
      • Another idea is to present a “suggested” machine / configuration option to the students for which they would have the promise of more support from IT

5.  Next Meeting:   Mike will schedule another meeting if we receive a favorable response to our McGrath proposal (otherwise we are adjourned until fall).