| STAKEHOLDER RESEARCH PAPER--Performance Inventory | |||||
| BU113: Critical Thinking and Communication in Business | |||||
| Name: | POSSIBLE POINTS | YOUR POINTS | |||
| The Situation (20%) | 20 | ||||
| Depth of discussion | 5 | ||||
| Company background | 5 | ||||
| Specifics with support | 5 | ||||
| In-text citations to support facts/claims (format/completeness) | 5 | ||||
| Impacts (20%) | 20 | ||||
| Depth of analysis | 4 | ||||
| Support (specifics) | 4 | ||||
| Focus on stakeholder group | 4 | ||||
| Variety of actions taken and their impacts | 4 | ||||
| In-text citations to support facts/claims (format/completeness) | 4 | ||||
| Core Values and Ethical Dilemmas (20%) | 20 | ||||
| Focus on several of the 6 core values | 4 | ||||
| Focus on stakeholder group | 4 | ||||
| Support (specific) | 4 | ||||
| Discussion of ethical dilemmas | 4 | ||||
| In-text citations to support facts/claims (format/completeness) | 4 | ||||
| Ethical Analysis (20%) | 20 | ||||
| 2 or more guidelines | 5 | ||||
| Depth of discussion | 5 | ||||
| Alternatives proposed | 5 | ||||
| Personal beliefs | 5 | ||||
| Writing (20%) | 20 | ||||
| Introduction/Conclusion/Organization | 4 | ||||
| Clarity, style, flow | 4 | ||||
| Quality of grammar/wording/mechanics | 4 | ||||
| Synthesis of ideas/cohesion of overall memo | 4 | ||||
| References (APA format, completeness, capitalization, punctuation) | 4 | ||||
| TOTAL: | 100 | ||||
| GRADE: | |||||
© 2012 Christine Bauer-Ramazani/Joanne Scott, Saint Michael's College. last modified: February 18, 2013